The Drive37%

Locals Keep Driving on This Buckled Bridge Because It’s Quicker Than the Detour 79%

By Stephen Edelstein55%

7/18/2026, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 707 faulty-reasoning hits from 424 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,640 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the article peer group.

Nobody likes to sit in traffic , but drivers in central Greece are resorting to extreme measures to make their trips as short as possible. 
Residents of the city of Larissa and the farming communities surrounding it are using a bridge that collapsed almost three years ago because it’s shorter than the posted detour. 
As reported by local media outlet LarissaNet (via Carscoops ), the story started with Storm Daniel, which ripped through Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Libya in September 2023, leaving thousands of casualties and plenty of destroyed infrastructure in its wake. 
In Thessaly—the north-central Greek administrative region of which Larissa is the capital—79 bridges were destroyed. 
One of them was the Palaeopyrgos Bridge over the Pineios River. 
But apparently the bridge wasn’t destroyed enough to deter impatient drivers. 
We’re not talking about a full collapse here, where there is nothing left of the span. 
Instead, the bridge sagged like a paper plate at a backyard barbecue, the center section dipping down to within inches of the water but not actually falling in. 
Nor did it detach from the sections on either side. 
So it’s still possible to get across without testing a car’s water-fording capability. 
That’s exactly what local residents are doing. 
Drone footage posted by LarissaNet shows a Ford Ranger driving down into the depression and back up the other side like it’s on a manufacturer’s test track. 
The driver doesn’t seem concerned by the fact that the bridge, which has been hanging unsupported for almost three years, could drop into the river at any time. 
The risk is incentivized because, according to the local news coverage, the only other way across the river is a slow detour to the National Highway. 
Farmers don’t want to waste time and fuel going the safe route, and local officials aren’t really doing anything to dissuade them. 
Traffic is officially banned from the collapsed bridge, but it’s not physically blocked by barriers or police. 
Navigation systems even reportedly route drivers to the bridge. 
Even if there’s no funding to replace the bridge, one would think the local government would do more to prevent drivers from continuing to use it as an unofficial river crossing. 
Hopefully the video footage spreading across the internet will spur officials into action before a rescue operation is needed. 
Got a tip? 
Reach out to tips@thedrive.com 
The post Locals Keep Driving on This Buckled Bridge Because It’s Quicker Than the Detour appeared first on The Drive . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.8%Stephen Edelstein: 3.4%The Drive: 3.0%Confirmation Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.9%The Drive: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Stephen Edelstein: 5.3%The Drive: 4.0%Availability Heuristic17.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 2.1%The Drive: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.6%Stephen Edelstein: 1.4%The Drive: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 7.3%Stephen Edelstein: 2.4%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias7.3%This article: 6.8%Stephen Edelstein: 9.8%The Drive: 4.6%Framing Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.0%The Drive: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.1%Stephen Edelstein: 2.0%The Drive: 0.7%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.6%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Stephen Edelstein: 9.3%The Drive: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 7.3%Stephen Edelstein: 1.5%The Drive: 2.0%Pessimism Bias7.3%This article: 17.7%Stephen Edelstein: 3.2%The Drive: 6.7%Negativity Bias17.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.8%The Drive: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Stephen Edelstein: 2.2%The Drive: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error7.8%This article: 6.6%Stephen Edelstein: 0.4%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 7.5%The Drive: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.8%The Drive: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.4%The Drive: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 7.3%The Drive: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.2%Stephen Edelstein: 2.3%The Drive: 1.9%False Dilemma9.2%This article: 4.5%Stephen Edelstein: 0.3%The Drive: 1.0%Slippery Slope4.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Stephen Edelstein: 7.8%The Drive: 6.6%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.0%The Drive: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.9%Stephen Edelstein: 1.5%The Drive: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion5.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.4%The Drive: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.1%Stephen Edelstein: 1.2%The Drive: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.3%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof7.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.0%Stephen Edelstein: 9.8%The Drive: 3.5%Anecdotal13.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.1%Stephen Edelstein: 2.9%The Drive: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.3%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.4%Special Pleading7.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.2%Stephen Edelstein: 2.9%The Drive: 2.1%Unattributed Quote9.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.7%The Drive: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 10.0%The Drive: 11.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.5%Stephen Edelstein: 2.5%The Drive: 1.4%Indoctrination4.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Stephen Edelstein: 0.8%The Drive: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.7%

424 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers11%attributed speech376writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLarissaNet • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageThe Drive • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

LarissaNet

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words56% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%LarissaNet: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%LarissaNet: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%LarissaNet: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.