Gothamist⁠76%

Jury acquits man of top murder charge in killing of NYPD officer, convicts of manslaughter ⁠0%

By Ben Feuerherd⁠0%

4/2/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 993 faulty-reasoning hits from 611 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

A jury in Queens has acquitted a man of the top murder charge in the death of NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller in Far Rockaway two years ago, while convicting him of aggravated manslaughter and other charges. 
The defendant, 36-year-old Guy Rivera, could have faced life in prison without the possibility of parole if he had been found guilty of first-degree murder. 
Instead, jurors convicted him of aggravated manslaughter in the first degree, attempted murder and other charges. 
Rivera faces up to 90 years to life in prison when he is sentenced. 
His sentencing is scheduled for April 27. 
Rivera’s trial lasted more than three weeks. 
Jurors deliberated for about eight hours before reaching a verdict, according to prosecutors. 
Jurors heard from several NYPD officers, who testified they were with Diller when they stopped Rivera as he was sitting in the passenger seat of a car on Mott Avenue in March 2024. 
Police body-camera footage played at the trial showed one of the officers, Sgt. 
Sasha Rosen, struggling with Rivera to gain control of a handgun before a single shot was fired, striking Diller in the abdomen and mortally wounding him. 
Prosecutors argued Rivera acted intentionally and knowingly shot Diller after aiming his gun at him. 
They also said Rivera tried to shoot Rosen after firing the fatal shot, but the gun jammed. 
“Excuses two years later don’t amount to evidence,” Assistant District Attorney John Kosinski told jurors in his closing argument. 
“He pulled that trigger. 
It was in his hand. 
That’s what happened here.” 
“One person is responsible for those actions,” Kosinski added. 
“This defendant.” 
Kosinski said Rivera had a motive to kill Diller because he knew he was going to be arrested for having an illegal gun in his pocket and another one in the glove compartment of the car. 
“He directed that gun at the person who stood between him and freedom and pulled the trigger,” the assistant district attorney said. 
Rivera’s defense attorneys from the nonprofit Legal Aid Society attempted to undermine the narrative put forth by prosecutors. 
In their telling, the fatal shooting was the result of a chaotic struggle that started when Rosen reached into the car and pulled Rivera’s arm as he was trying to ditch the handgun he had in his pocket. 
In his closing argument, defense attorney Jamal Johnson told jurors that Diller was not in Rivera’s view when the shot went off, so Rivera could not have intended to kill the officer. 
“You can’t be afraid to come into this courtroom and say the words ‘not guilty,’” Johnson told the jurors, arguing prosecutors had not shown evidence of intent or motive to kill a police officer. 
He added that the entire case was investigated by the NYPD and jurors heard only from law enforcement eyewitnesses during the trial, arguing officers had an interest in the outcome. 
Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz said in a statement that the shooting “stole the life of a dutiful officer and a family man” and endangered another officer. 
Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said in a statement she was disappointed Rivera was not convicted of the top murder charge, but noted he was found guilty on other counts. 
“My hope is that the ultimate sentence in this case will reflect the gravity of his actions,” Tisch wrote on social media. 
Thirty-one-year-old Diller’s killing gained national attention in the midst of the 2024 presidential election. 
President Donald Trump, who was running on a tough-on-crime message, attended Diller’s wake on Long Island, where the officer lived with his wife and young son, during the campaign. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.1%Ben Feuerherd: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias12.1%This article: 6.4%Ben Feuerherd: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 6.9%Ben Feuerherd: 6.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Ben Feuerherd: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.7%This article: 11.9%Ben Feuerherd: 8.0%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect11.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Ben Feuerherd: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.3%This article: 9.8%Ben Feuerherd: 11.0%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 2.9%Ben Feuerherd: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 5.1%Ben Feuerherd: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 5.4%Ben Feuerherd: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias5.4%This article: 4.9%Ben Feuerherd: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Ben Feuerherd: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem2.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.5%Ben Feuerherd: 5.6%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority2.5%This article: 10.8%Ben Feuerherd: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma10.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Ben Feuerherd: 5.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 4.9%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring4.9%This article: 4.7%Ben Feuerherd: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 20.3%Ben Feuerherd: 6.3%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion20.3%This article: 5.2%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 8.2%Ben Feuerherd: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.6%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.6%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 3.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Ben Feuerherd: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Ben Feuerherd: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 2.1%Ben Feuerherd: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 2.5%Ben Feuerherd: 2.0%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice2.5%This article: 3.6%Ben Feuerherd: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

611 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers45%attributed speech336writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kosinski • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJamal Johnson • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJamal Johnson • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJamal Johnson • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMelinda Katz • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Kosinski

100%flagged-word coverage
101 attributed words37% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+18.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Kosinski: 18.8%18.8%Biased Writer Voice-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%John Kosinski: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%John Kosinski: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.