Gothamist⁠77%

29-year-old man dies in city custody after arraignment at Bronx courthouse ⁠9%

By Ryan Kost⁠75%

7/25/2026, 5:35:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 246 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (20,088 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

A 29-year-old man died after he was found unresponsive in a holding cell at a Bronx courthouse following his arraignment Friday, New York’s Department of Correction said. 
Pagan was found shortly before 6 p.m. and given medical aid before being transported to Lincoln Hospital, the department said in a statement. 
He was pronounced dead at 6:37 p.m. 
“We are deeply saddened by this tragedy, and we share our condolences with Mr. 
Pagan's loved ones,” Commissioner Stanley Richards said in a statement. 
“We will investigate the circumstances of this death in coordination with city and state authorities.” 
Pagan is at least the fifth person to die in, or shortly after leaving, Department of Correction custody this year. 
The four earlier deaths all involved people held on Rikers Island who died after medical emergencies, two in March and two in May. 
At least 15 people died in 2025, according to oversight records, the most since 2022. 
New York City’s jail system remains under federal oversight for years of violence and dangerous conditions at Rikers Island. 
In January, the federal judge in charge of reforming Rikers appointed a remediation manager to force changes to the system. 
In his first action plan, filed earlier this month, the manager wrote that the Department of Correction struggles to perform even basic functions like staffing posts, securing housing units and keeping people safe. 
Pagan’s attorney could not immediately be reached for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Ryan Kost: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 7.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.3%Ryan Kost: 10.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias29.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Ryan Kost: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 6.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.6%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 5.7%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 3.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.5%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

246 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech207writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageStanley Richards • 14 words • 0.0% coverageStanley Richards • 10 words • 0.0% coverageStanley Richards • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stanley Richards

0%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words100% of attributed speech53% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.