KQED61%

After 14 Homicides in 2026, San Francisco Calls for Ceasefire 0%

By Ella Jackson68%

4/10/2026, 3:00:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 986 faulty-reasoning hits from 548 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

San Francisco officials and advocates announced a 24-hour city-wide ceasefire Thursday, drawing attention to a recent spike in homicides. 
While every other crime in San Francisco is down, homicides are up 250%. 
Last year, San Francisco saw 28 homicides total  its lowest rate in more than 70 years. 
But four months into 2026, there have already been 14 homicides, nine of which involved guns, according to the San Francisco Police Commission. 
“I can’t tell you how many mothers and fathers and grandmothers I’ve had to sit across from and see their tears because they’ve had to bury their children and their grandchildren,” San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said at a press conference on Thursday morning. 
Advocates who spearheaded the event called out the gunfire that broke out near Margaret S. 
Hayward Playground in February, killing 15-year-old Jayda Pearl Mabrey and sending two other teenagers to the hospital. 
“​Can we sit on our hands for one day for the youth? 
One day, y’all,” community leader and founder of United Playaz Rudy Corpuz Jr. asked the audience. 
Responding to a question about the uptick in gun violence, Corpuz Jr. pointed to “a lot of people who are angry, frustrated, and a lot have access to guns.” 
United Playaz Executive Director Rudy Corpuz Jr. at a press conference on June 29, 2018. 
(Anna Kusmer/KQED) 
Mayor Daniel Lurie emphasized a need to build stronger connections between City Hall and the community. 
He said that the city is making sure officers are present and actively building relationships, and pointed to “real progress” in staffing the police department and welcoming a new class of officers. 
On Thursday, Corpuz Jr. said the idea for a ceasefire was born out of a conversation with Demetrius Dixon, who is currently incarcerated in California State Prison, Solano. 
Dixon had learned that shootings in the Bay Area had jumped, from Stockton to San Francisco, and wanted to do something about it. 
So, he called up Corpuz Jr. 
“If we’re successful, then we could probably take it to the next city,” Corpuz Jr. said. 
They hope to eventually broker a ceasefire across all of Northern California. 
The call for a ceasefire comes the day after the San Francisco Police Commissioner raised questions about the dismissal of a victim advocate within the police department at a time when homicides are up. 
At a public meeting on Wednesday, Police Commissioner Mattie Scott said that she received numerous calls from mothers asking why Lisa Ortiz, former manager of investigations for the SFPD, lost her job with the city. 
Ortiz could not be reached for comment. 
“A lot of folks are concerned about that, particularly with the homicide rate and the shootings that have gone up,” Scott said. 
In response to Scott’s questions about Ortiz, Police Chief Derrick Lew said that city-wide budget cuts impacted the police department. 
Lurie’s office declined to comment. 
Activists described Ortiz, who worked directly with victims and survivors, as a key point of connection for the community. 
“I depended on her,” Paulette Brown, the mother of a teenage boy who was gunned down in San Francisco in 2006, said. 
“Every time we get somebody that helps us, they’re gone.” 
KQED’s Juan Carlos Lara contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Ella Jackson: 3.0%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 1.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Ella Jackson: 5.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic20.8%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Ella Jackson: 7.4%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%Ella Jackson: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Ella Jackson: 3.4%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias10.9%This article: 1.8%Ella Jackson: 2.7%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 18.6%Ella Jackson: 9.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias18.6%This article: 5.8%Ella Jackson: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias5.8%This article: 5.3%Ella Jackson: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 5.1%Ella Jackson: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Ella Jackson: 1.7%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Ella Jackson: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias12.2%This article: 3.1%Ella Jackson: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.2%Ella Jackson: 4.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority4.2%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.9%Ella Jackson: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%Ella Jackson: 3.9%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.1%Ella Jackson: 9.5%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion11.1%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.4%Ella Jackson: 4.4%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.4%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.6%Ella Jackson: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof3.6%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.2%Ella Jackson: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division2.2%This article: 10.6%Ella Jackson: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Ella Jackson: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Ella Jackson: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 2.3%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.2%Ella Jackson: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination2.2%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Ella Jackson: 0.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.9%

548 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers59%attributed speech222writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBrooke Jenkins • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRudy Corpuz Jr. • 12 words • 100.0% coverageRudy Corpuz Jr. • 16 words • 100.0% coverageRudy Corpuz Jr. • 29 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Playaz • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Lurie • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Lurie • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRudy Corpuz Jr. • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRudy Corpuz Jr. • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMattie Scott • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMattie Scott • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDerrick Lew • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePaulette Brown • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePaulette Brown • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKQED • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paulette Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words9.8% of attributed speech87% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.