KQED61%

Is ICE at SFO? Here’s What We Know About Videos of Woman Being Forcefully Detained 0%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

3/23/2026, 9:32:41 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 660 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

While Bay Area officials criticized the actions of plainclothes immigration officers seen forcefully handling a woman at San Francisco International Airport on Sunday night, they said there does not seem to be a wider federal operation at SFO. 
In footage that spread quickly on social media, men wearing dark clothing without visible badges or agency markings are seen pulling a visibly distraught woman from a bench in an airport terminal around 10 p.m. 
Sunday. 
One of the men pries her fingers from the bench while the other pushes her into a wheelchair. 
Eyewitnesses can be heard asking the agents to show their badges and provide badge numbers. 
Nearby, a girl who appears to be about 10 years old is heard crying. 
One person in the background of the video said, “This is illegal.” 
“For ICE agents to be at SFO, deporting someone with a child and engaging in pretty violent behavior towards that person, it is so disgusting and unacceptable. 
We want ICE to get the hell out,” state Sen. 
Scott Wiener said Monday, speaking to reporters outside of SFO’s international terminal. 
According to a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, the woman and her daughter were arrested at the airport and were being “escorted to the international terminal for processing” when the woman tried to flee. 
The family had a final order of removal from an immigration judge in 2019, according to the DHS spokesperson. 
SFO spokesperson Doug Yakel said in a statement that the agents were “transporting two individuals on an outbound flight when this incident occurred,” though DHS did not clarify if the woman had been arrested prior to arriving at the airport. 
Mayor Daniel Lurie said in a statement on social media that he found the incident upsetting but believes it was an isolated event. 
“We have no reason to believe there is broader federal immigration enforcement at SFO,” he wrote. 
The detention comes as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are deployed to more than a dozen U.S. airports, a move that the Trump administration said is meant to supplement security staffing during a partial government shutdown that has led to long waits for air travelers across the country. 
Transportation Security Administration employees have been working without pay since DHS funding lapsed in February, and now many are calling out sick or resigning, according to the agency. 
SFO has privately contracted security screeners, who are not affected by the lapse in federal funding. 
Videos of the SFO incident show a line of San Francisco police officers standing between a crowd of onlookers and the federal authorities detaining the woman. 
The San Francisco Police Department said its officers responded to the scene around 10 p.m. after receiving a 911 call related to the incident, but that they were not involved in the woman’s detention. 
SFPD spokesperson Robert Rueca said in a statement that the officers determined that the incident involved federal law enforcement agents and “remained at the scene to maintain public safety.” 
The San Francisco Rapid Response Network, which verifies community alerts about possible ICE sightings, was still trying to determine details midday Monday. 
Milli Atkinson, who directs the Immigrant Legal Defense Program at the Bar Association of San Francisco, said travelers who are concerned about ICE should refer to the American Civil Liberties Union’s “Know Your Rights in Airports” guidelines. 
“The video of a mother being aggressively detained by ICE agents in front of her daughter at the San Francisco International Airport is yet another heartbreaking example of how Trump’s inhumane immigration enforcement is terrorizing communities across America,” Bay Area Rep. 
Kevin Mullin and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi said in a joint statement. 
“After killing people in our streets and detaining U.S. citizens, ICE has lost all credibility and trust with the public. 
We demand immediate answers as to the mother’s and her child’s condition and the grounds for their detainment.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 30.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect30.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias15.5%This article: 5.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem3.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 13.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring13.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion17.0%This article: 4.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 10.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection10.3%This article: 15.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice15.5%This article: 8.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination8.3%This article: 22.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias22.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

660 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers47%attributed speech352writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageScott Wiener • 27 words • 100.0% coverageScott Wiener • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Lurie • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Lurie • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThe San Francisco Police Department • 34 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Rueca • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMilli Atkinson • 37 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Mullin and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Mullin and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi • 20 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Mullin and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Scott Wiener

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words12% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+86.4 ptsWriter: 13.6%Scott Wiener: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+73.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Scott Wiener: 73.0%73.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.0 ptsWriter: 29.0%Scott Wiener: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Scott Wiener: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.