Monthly report shows spike in delinquent taxes, but history says the money is on the way 30%

By Michael Phillips33%

8/6/2026, 6:03:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 1,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 644 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of 30% (20,307 of 29,022 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the article peer group.

Each month, Richmond’s elected representatives are given a look into the city’s financial state. 
The most recent report received by the City Council showed an alarming spike in tax revenues that went uncollected by the city, which has been a hot topic in recent years. 
According to the report, Richmond collected just 25% of the personal property taxes owed by residents this year. 
Mayor Danny Avula says that number is misleading, and history backs his assertion up. 
Last year’s numbers were similarly alarming, but in the final report issued months later, 91% of the tax had been collected. 
The June report is particularly volatile because car tax payments are due on June 5, and state law marks a payment delinquent the following day. 
“It’s people, like all of us, who maybe just didn’t get the bill in on time and didn’t pay it but will in the next couple of weeks,” Avula told 12 On Your Side in a Wednesday interview . 
A city spokesperson also pointed to the city’s process of reconciling finances, which has not yet accounted for some payments that are already in. 
“While some taxpayers do pay late, many payments have already been received but, as part of the normal accounting reconciliation process, are not yet reflected in the preliminary June reporting,” spokesperson Mira Signer said. 
While the car tax number was a headliner on the report, the city’s primary source of revenue is the real estate tax, and those bills have been collected at a 98% rate from residents in each of the last two years. 
Real estate tax bills came under the microscope two years ago when it was revealed that sales of severely delinquent properties had been paused during COVID, and had not yet resumed. 
How Richmond’s tax sale fund swelled to $9M, with no clear use for the money 
The revelation of the sum has raised questions about why a supposedly cash-strapped city had that amount of money available and apparently uncommitted to any particular purpose. 
Wednesday, Avula hinted at a resumption of that program. 
“We are going to restart that and we are going to do it really thoughtfully,” he said in the TV interview . 
“That’s going to come into effect this year and we’re really going to go after out-of-town owners or non-occupant owners initially.” 
One concern is that unpaid taxes become uncollectable after 20 years, but taxes from that time range represent a small amount of the delinquent taxes overall. 
Richmond’s DPU also increased its bill-collection efforts after watching its unpaid tally soar to $66.9 million in the years after COVID  that number has since come down. 
With $47.6 million in delinquent bills, DPU launches repayment campaign 
“We can’t continue to operate like this.” 
What wasn’t immediately clear is why the city has received some tax revenues that aren’t reflected in the monthly report. 
Richmond’s Department of Finance has been plagued by issues over the past decade, and the outgoing director said in a presentation last July that modernizing the department “will not be and cannot be a quick fix.” 
As Richmond’s departing finance director touts progress, she warns there are still ‘pockets of secrecy and sabotage’ 
The list of aspirations for the future included a “culture of excellence adhered to by all employees” and the “right people in the right seats.” 
The city provided a chart to The Richmonder showing that the June spike in delinquent taxes has historically been followed by a reduction in future months, as shown in the monthly reporting to Council. 
The real estate tax rate will once again be on the agenda when Council meets this fall, as discussions take place about lowering Richmond’s rate for the first time in nearly two decades. 
Contact Michael Phillips at mphillips@richmonder.org . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.1%Michael Phillips: 0.6%The Richmonder: 1.3%Confirmation Bias17.1%This article: 3.9%Michael Phillips: 0.9%The Richmonder: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.9%The Richmonder: 1.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.0%Michael Phillips: 0.4%The Richmonder: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Michael Phillips: 0.8%The Richmonder: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 8.9%Michael Phillips: 3.2%The Richmonder: 2.3%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.8%The Richmonder: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Michael Phillips: 0.5%The Richmonder: 0.7%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.0%Michael Phillips: 3.4%The Richmonder: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.0%This article: 9.8%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Pessimism Bias9.8%This article: 15.7%Michael Phillips: 3.2%The Richmonder: 2.4%Negativity Bias15.7%This article: 11.6%Michael Phillips: 0.6%The Richmonder: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias11.6%This article: 5.3%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.3%The Richmonder: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.2%The Richmonder: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 3.6%The Richmonder: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Michael Phillips: 0.3%The Richmonder: 0.5%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.0%Michael Phillips: 0.4%The Richmonder: 1.9%Appeal to Authority7.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.6%False Dilemma1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Michael Phillips: 0.8%The Richmonder: 1.5%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 2.3%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Red Herring2.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.1%Michael Phillips: 1.1%The Richmonder: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.0%Michael Phillips: 0.4%The Richmonder: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.1%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.2%Burden of Proof3.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Michael Phillips: 0.6%The Richmonder: 1.6%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Michael Phillips: 0.7%The Richmonder: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.4%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Middle Ground6.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Special Pleading4.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.1%Michael Phillips: 1.5%The Richmonder: 0.7%Unattributed Quote7.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.1%The Richmonder: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 3.7%The Richmonder: 1.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.3%The Richmonder: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 0.0%The Richmonder: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Phillips: 9.6%The Richmonder: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

644 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers20%attributed speech514writer words
Selected voice

Danny Avula

100%flagged-word coverage
96 attributed words74% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+39.3 ptsWriter: 1.4%Danny Avula: 40.6%40.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.