Gothamist77%

Gourmet pizza is all the rage in NYC. Are the towers of toppings worth the high price? 59%

By Walter Wuthmann0%

5/25/2026, 12:01:02 PM

Topics: Food
Keywords: Pizza, Food, Nyc, Gourmet, Slices

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 622 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,177 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

About 80 people waited outside L’Industrie Pizzeria’s West Village location before the shop even opened on a recent weekday morning. 
The doors opened at noon, and the aroma of fresh-baked pizza wafted out onto the street. 
The line moved quickly. 
Before eating, many people snapped pictures of their slices, which featured big, cold scoops of burrata melting onto the hot pizza like thick ice cream. 
At $5.75 apiece, the shop’s famous burrata slices are a far cry from the dollar slices of old. 
“It’s good s---,” said Carsen Durham, who came from Williamsburg. 
“The cost, it doesn't even bother me because this pizza is so good that it's worth it.” 
L’Industrie, which opened in 2017 and now has three locations in Manhattan and Brooklyn, is a pioneer in the city’s fancy pizza slice movement. 
You can now get gourmet slices basically anywhere in the city, with each shop offering all kinds of unusual toppings: vodka sauce and crunchy garlic chili oil in SoHo; prosciutto and truffle in Hudson Square; or lobster and shrimp in Bed Stuy. 
These slices cost from $6 to $8 apiece  or nearly $20 for the lobster. 
They are lavish creations made for the Instagram age. 
“Places are looking for newer and more novel topping combinations that are still delicious, but that grab people's attention,” said Adam Kuban, a New York City pizza historian who for years ran the blog Slice. 
New York City’s climbing pizza prices match its skyrocketing rents and living costs. 
Like the newfangled high rise with sweeping views, these fancy slices may look good  but is their price justified? 
At Fermento, which opened on Varick Street in SoHo last year, you can try a complex prosciutto slice, which has dollops of fresh ricotta and a truffle oil drizzle. 
Owner Mike Vendome said the pizzeria’s name comes from its 72-hour “double bulk” dough fermentation process. 
“You wind up getting a dough that has great crumb, great texture, nice elasticity, a little bit of flavor development,” he said. 
The base is thin and crispy but sturdy enough to support the weight of its luxurious toppings. 
A single slice costs over $6. 
“We're using all top-quality ingredients,” Vendome said. 
“To be honest with you, for the stuff I'm using compared to the other pizzerias, my slice I think is very fair priced.” 
A few blocks away is LTD Pizza and Bar, which makes a Sicilian slice topped with vodka sauce and charred pepperoni cups. 
They recommend topping it with their house “smokey crunchy garlic chili oil.” 
For $8 a slice, it’s a filling workday lunch  maybe a bit too filling. 
But there are still plenty of places where the old school survives. 
Luigi’s Pizza in Park Slope has been run by the same family with the same recipes since 1973. 
Owner Gio Lanzo said he’s had a hard time teaching other people to make his dough  he doesn’t measure the ingredients out, he listens to the sound of the machine and adjusts. 
“The dough talks to you,” Lanzo said. 
“I was born in this.” 
Lanzo said he’s well aware of the new kinds of slice shops opening across the city. 
“Everybody's familiar with them. 
You know what? 
God bless them,” he said. 
“Let them do what they want. 
I'll do what I want.” 
A regular slice at Luigi’s is $3.50. 
Lanzo said his philosophy is very simple:  Dough, sauce, and cheese. 
The best combination on Earth.” 
Lanzo said he doesn’t plan to change to keep up with the competition. 
It’s worked for his family for over 50 years, he said. 
“Let's see how long they last.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Walter Wuthmann: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 6.4%Walter Wuthmann: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 7.4%Walter Wuthmann: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 6.8%Walter Wuthmann: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Walter Wuthmann: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 6.1%Walter Wuthmann: 7.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.7%Walter Wuthmann: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias7.7%This article: 1.8%Walter Wuthmann: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.8%This article: 4.2%Walter Wuthmann: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.2%This article: 1.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.0%This article: 6.3%Walter Wuthmann: 4.8%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias6.3%This article: 10.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Walter Wuthmann: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.3%This article: 7.7%Walter Wuthmann: 3.2%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Walter Wuthmann: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%Walter Wuthmann: 3.1%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 3.4%Walter Wuthmann: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.7%Walter Wuthmann: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.7%This article: 17.4%Walter Wuthmann: 3.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization17.4%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Walter Wuthmann: 1.3%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 4.3%Walter Wuthmann: 4.5%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%Walter Wuthmann: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.7%Walter Wuthmann: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.7%This article: 1.1%Walter Wuthmann: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature1.1%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.3%Walter Wuthmann: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal5.3%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Walter Wuthmann: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground3.2%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.8%Walter Wuthmann: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.8%This article: 1.6%Walter Wuthmann: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote1.6%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.2%Walter Wuthmann: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice18.2%This article: 5.6%Walter Wuthmann: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination5.6%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Walter Wuthmann: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Walter Wuthmann: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.0%

622 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers44%attributed speech349writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCarsen Durham • 10 words • 100.0% coverageCarsen Durham • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Kuban • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMike Vendome • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMike Vendome • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMike Vendome • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMike Vendome • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageLTD Pizza and Bar • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 33 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 3 words • 100.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGio Lanzo • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Adam Kuban

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words13% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Adam Kuban: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.5 ptsWriter: 31.5%Adam Kuban: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%Adam Kuban: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.