Gizmodo57%

Europa's Hidden Ocean May Be Even Harder to Reach Than We Thought 5%

By Gayoung Lee22%

7/24/2026, 1:45:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,969 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the article peer group.

Earlier this year, researchers warned against the dangers of “fluffy ice” on Europa’s surface. 
If unaccounted for, missions headed to Jupiter’s moon could drown themselves in its deep, icy oceans. 
A new study suggests that this won’t happen—but for reasons that won’t make our Europa trips any easier. 
A paper published yesterday in Nature Astronomy challenges the assumption that the shallow pools of water on Europa’s surface represent a direct access route to the moon’s deep, icy oceans. 
In theory, this supposed access route could make it easier for a probe to explore how liquid water from Europa’s deep oceans traveled through cracks in the ice to the surface. 
Unfortunately, we’re not sure if this even happens. 
“This is exactly what we wanted to test,” Lujendra Ojha, the study’s first author and an earth scientist at Rutgers University, told Gizmodo. 
“In particular, we asked whether the water could travel this distance before losing enough heat to freeze and whether the fractures could remain open long enough to transport a meaningful amount of water.” 
Prospects real icy 
For the study, Ojha and colleagues simulated the movement and cooling of water inside the fractures of Europa’s icy shell. 
In a Rutgers statement, Ojha explained that earlier models “often treated water rising through Europa’s ice as if it moved in a relatively orderly way.” 
They also draw an analogy between volcanoes and icy volcanoes, although there are “fundamental” differences between ice, liquid water, lava, and volcanoes, he added. 
The latest approach, on the other hand, takes a more realistic approach by accommodating for numerous factors, such as water velocity, the size of the crack, turbulence, and supercooling. 
The simulations arrived at a simple—perhaps discouraging—conclusion. 
All things considered, there are too many obstacles for deep ocean water to reliably arrive at the surface. 
For instance, if the water rises turbulently, it would “lose heat rapidly to the surrounding ice and form small ice crystals that could eventually clog the fracture,” Ojha told Gizmodo. 
For the Europa fans 
So the small pools of water we’ve observed at the surface probably come from melted sections of the icy crust, rather than from deep down below. 
Having said that, Ojha told Gizmodo that the findings don’t necessarily warrant drastic shifts in our missions to Europa. 
But if spacecraft detect shallow liquid-water reservoirs on Europa, we’d be smart not to “automatically assume that the water came from Europa’s deep ocean,” he said. 
“In that case, the chemical, physical, maybe biological constraints we are able to derive from studying the shallow liquid water layer may not at all reflect the chemistry of the underlying ocean,” Ojha concluded. 
“Future missions should, therefore, focus not only on finding shallow water but also on determining its origin and whether it is connected to the deeper ocean.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.5%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.8%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 3.2%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 3.4%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 4.7%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.7%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Gayoung Lee: 2.7%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.1%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.4%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.4%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 2.9%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.5%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 4.9%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 7.1%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.8%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.8%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.7%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 1.5%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 2.6%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 4.3%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 3.9%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gayoung Lee: 0.3%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

476 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker36%attributed speech304writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 34 words • 0.0% coverageLujendra Ojha • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lujendra Ojha

0%flagged-word coverage
172 attributed words100% of attributed speech34% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.