BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 412 faulty-reasoning hits from 421 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of 28% (22,241 of 30,497 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the article peer group.

Water use, noise and cost are among some residents’ concerns as data center plans continue to expand in Cedar Creek. 
The overview 
Developer EdgeConneX is nearing completion of the first of 19 buildings across three campuses along FM 535—the first of which will be filled by AI cloud company CoreWeave. 
About 7 miles south, Pacifico Energy is pursuing a separate 2,842-acre data center and on-site natural gas power project. 
Together, the four sites span about 4,306 acres. 
“We had a beautiful forest; it’s all gone,” said Cedar Creek resident and business owner Maria Bowen, whose neighborhood sits less than 2,000 feet from EdgeConneX. 
Damian Ameen, who also lives in Cedar Creek, said development is unavoidable, but “there does need to be control, and it needs to be balanced.” 
“What’s this land going to be used for if we don’t use it for data centers?” 
he asked. 
“It’s not going to sit vacant. 
Not in this area.” 
What's happening 
Bowen said she learned that the construction she’d been watching for months was for a data center less than a week before EdgeConneX held three open-house-style meetings in mid-June. 
She found them helpful, but believes more should have been communicated—and sooner. 
Like Bowen, other residents wished there had been more communication from the start. 
“I have a lot of questions that I thought would be answered ... they couldn’t tell me specifics,” said Brittney Hoch, Bastrop resident and president of the Coalition of Democratic Allies. 
Hoch said she hoped Bastrop County commissioners would take notice of residents’ frustration and reconsider or pause the projects; however, Bastrop County spokesperson Lyndsey Schroeder said that isn’t a decision counties can make, noting it lies more in permitting and abatement approvals. 
As of press time July 24, commissioners planned a public hearing July 27 to consider updated tax-abatement guidelines with stricter requirements. 
Some residents are turning to community organizing for answers. 
More than 100 people packed into Bastrop’s Hampton Inn & Suites on July 22 for a cross-partisan town hall, where Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller called for a moratorium. 
“We have got to put some guardrails around this industry, or we’re going to be in a huge train wreck,” he said. 
Bastrop resident Linda Curtis, co-founder of the League of Independent Voters, spearheaded the event and said a lack of local transparency is creating confusion and frustration. 
“We can choose anger or organizing for open government,” she said. 
“I choose the latter.” 
What residents are asking 
Others to watch 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Amanda Cutshall: 1.8%Community Impact: 1.1%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Amanda Cutshall: 1.3%Community Impact: 1.0%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 2.1%Community Impact: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Amanda Cutshall: 3.1%Community Impact: 2.4%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 1.5%Community Impact: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Amanda Cutshall: 2.6%Community Impact: 0.8%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 20.0%Amanda Cutshall: 9.8%Community Impact: 2.6%Negativity Bias20.0%This article: 1.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.2%Community Impact: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Amanda Cutshall: 1.7%Community Impact: 0.3%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.7%Community Impact: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 1.7%Community Impact: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.6%Amanda Cutshall: 3.2%Community Impact: 0.4%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 5.2%Amanda Cutshall: 3.9%Community Impact: 0.2%Slippery Slope5.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.1%Amanda Cutshall: 1.5%Community Impact: 1.1%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.9%Amanda Cutshall: 1.7%Community Impact: 0.2%Bandwagon6.9%This article: 11.4%Amanda Cutshall: 5.7%Community Impact: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion11.4%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 1.5%Community Impact: 0.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Amanda Cutshall: 1.5%Community Impact: 0.9%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.8%Amanda Cutshall: 1.2%Community Impact: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 3.6%Amanda Cutshall: 1.5%Community Impact: 0.5%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Cutshall: 0.0%Community Impact: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

421 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers47%attributed speech222writer words
Selected voice

Sid Miller

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words11% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Sid Miller: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Sid Miller: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.