CBC Arts46%

The Testaments star Chase Infiniti was once told not to watch The Handmaid’s Tale 7%

By Amelia Eqbal0%

4/22/2026, 7:46:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 197 faulty-reasoning hits from 615 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (19,127 of 20,473 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the article peer group.

Chase Infiniti remembers where she was when the TV adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale was released. 
“I remember it taking over my [high] school. 
Everybody around me was always talking about it, and always talking about the similarities also to what was going on in real life versus the show,” she says in a conversation with Q’s Tom Power. 
From there, Infiniti says her friends and peers started to read more of author Margaret Atwood’s work, including the original novel, and so she was “very familiar” with the world of Gilead before she joined it herself as the star of The Testaments, the TV adaptation of Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale sequel novel. 
But, while working one of her first professional acting jobs, Infiniti said she was advised not to watch Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale by one of her co-stars. 
“He said it would be a bit too intense for me,” she says. 
“I've definitely grown up a lot in the past two to three years. 
But also, at that point I was like, everything is so new and I was  I'm obviously so excited to be doing everything —- but I was even more excited then. 
And he was like, ‘I don't know, it might be a little bit too much for you.’ 
And I'm like, ‘I'll be fine. 
I'll be okay.’” 
WATCH | Full interview with Chase Infiniti: 
Upon reading The Testaments, which takes place in Gilead 15 years after the events of The Handmaid’s Tale, Infiniti says the thing that stood out to her about it most was the relationships between characters. 
“I was really struck by their friendship in a world where they're not allowed to have friends, they're not allowed to have connections with people  because that's what makes them dangerous, in a way. 
“And so, that was really my connection point because I have such a strong love for my friends, and Agnes has such a strong love for her friends, and all of these girls love each other so much.” 
In preparing to portray her character Agnes, who she thinks of as the “princess of Gilead,” Infiniti says she did some research into not only the experiences of people who grew up in very religious households, but also the experiences of people who grew up in cults. 
“I really wanted to do a deep dive into what it would be like to grow up in, I guess, a system where you don't really have any perspective of what the outside world is actually like versus what you've been taught your entire life,” she says. 
Towards the end of filming The Testaments, Infiniti got the chance to meet Atwood on set. 
“I remember getting briefed probably like 10 minutes before walking on to set one day that Margaret was coming around lunchtime and  you saw everyone have this, like, bolt of electricity running through them,” she says. 
“[She] welcomed me in with so much love and so much support…. 
It was a really cool moment because I'm here because of her.” 
Listen to the full interview with Chase Infiniti to hear her talk about how her K-pop dance videos helped her get an audition for One Battle After Another, what it was like learning karate in front of Paul Thomas Anderson, and her love of the movie musical Grease. 
The Testaments is available to stream now on Disney+. 
The full interview with Chase Infiniti is available on our YouTube channel and on our podcast, Q with Tom Power. 
Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts. 
Interview with Chase Infiniti produced by Simi Bassi. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 2.7%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.3%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Amelia Eqbal: 3.4%CBC: 3.2%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 2.2%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.7%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.9%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.8%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.1%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.2%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Amelia Eqbal: 2.4%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.3%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 4.2%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.9%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 4.9%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.5%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.5%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Amelia Eqbal: 4.4%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect14.1%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.5%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.4%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.9%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.5%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 2.4%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.5%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.3%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.3%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 8.0%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.3%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.3%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.1%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.2%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.9%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.1%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.2%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.4%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.5%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.6%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 1.7%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 2.2%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.4%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 2.9%CBC: 4.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 3.1%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.4%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Eqbal: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Amelia Eqbal: 5.7%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

615 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker50%attributed speech307writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 8 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 13 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 13 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 32 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 17 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 6 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 35 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 37 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChase Infiniti • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chase Infiniti

52%flagged-word coverage
308 attributed words100% of attributed speech12% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.1 ptsWriter: 12.1%Chase Infiniti: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.