Futurism88%

Terrified Tech Execs Are Traveling With Armed Bodyguards as AI Backlash Grows 71%

By Maggie Harrison Dupré81%

7/16/2026, 7:56:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 440 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,092 of 20,811 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the article peer group.

Public backlash to AI is intensifying  and transforming into real-world attempts at physical violence. 
Industry leaders are fearing for their lives. 
Leading AI companies and their top executives are beefing up security, the Wall Street Journal reports , as escalating anti-AI industry sentiment is culminating in threats and attempts of violence against the people and ventures building leading AI models. 
Some executives are even traveling with armed guards, while others have taken to keeping a lower public profile. 
“Tech CEOs, a few years ago, definitely did not have security,” Dakota Dominguez, an executive at the Silicon Valley-based security firm JPT Security, told the WSJ . 
“A lot of tech companies now are incorporating that into their budgets.” 
Earlier this year, the AI industry was shaken when a 20-year-old anti-AI activist named Daniel Moreno-Gama , armed with a gun and a Molotov cocktail, unsuccessfully tried to firebomb the home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. 
No one was injured, but the high-profile incident followed a string of violent threats and at least one OpenAI lockdown . 
OpenAI isn’t alone. 
Per the WSJ , around the time that Altman’s home was targeted, OpenAI rival Anthropic faced a close call when a man snuck into its headquarters behind an employee carrying an envelope with an executive’s name on it. 
The man reportedly then told a guard that the executive was “going to be killed.” 
The man was stopped before anyone got hurt. 
All in all, it’s easy to see why tech leaders are budgeting for beefed up security. 
Not all anti-AI sentiment has manifested in attempted physical violence. 
Activists have also shut down data centers , taken down AI-powered surveillance cameras , and protested outside AI company headquarters. 
As the fight over AI data centers heats up, some polls have shown that AI is less popular with Americans than Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 
People fear that AI will result in mass layoffs, a further consolidation of wealth and power, or even a catastrophic apocalypse  outcomes that many leaders in the AI industry have issued warnings about . 
“That’s why people are setting warehouses on fire,” a former Pinterest employee named Bonnie Kate Wolf, who was laid off during an AI-focused restructuring, told the WSJ . 
“You can’t go back to serfdom. 
It really feels like the people in power want to be kings. 
Historically, that doesn’t work out for kings.” 
More on AI tensions: AI Billionaires Are Starting to Get Scared 
The post Terrified Tech Execs Are Traveling With Armed Bodyguards as AI Backlash Grows appeared first on Futurism . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 7.7%Futurism: 5.8%Confirmation Bias16.1%This article: 6.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.2%Futurism: 1.7%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 48.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.8%Futurism: 6.2%Availability Heuristic48.2%This article: 4.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.4%Futurism: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.9%Futurism: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.2%Futurism: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias6.4%This article: 20.5%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.1%Futurism: 11.4%Framing Effect20.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.2%Futurism: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.8%Futurism: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.9%Futurism: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.2%Futurism: 4.2%Pessimism Bias12.3%This article: 26.4%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 15.4%Futurism: 22.3%Negativity Bias26.4%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.8%Futurism: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.4%Futurism: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.5%Futurism: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.0%Futurism: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.8%Futurism: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.3%Futurism: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.5%Futurism: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.9%Futurism: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 10.8%Futurism: 6.9%Appeal to Authority23.2%This article: 8.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.6%Futurism: 2.5%False Dilemma8.0%This article: 6.4%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.4%Futurism: 2.6%Slippery Slope6.4%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 7.8%Futurism: 10.5%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.4%Futurism: 0.9%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.2%Futurism: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.3%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.1%Futurism: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion17.3%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.7%Futurism: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 32.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 4.1%Futurism: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)32.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.3%Futurism: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.1%Futurism: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 28.6%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 4.5%Futurism: 4.4%Anecdotal28.6%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.8%Futurism: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.1%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.7%Futurism: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.8%Futurism: 3.9%Unattributed Quote9.1%This article: 6.4%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.9%Futurism: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 10.5%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 9.1%Futurism: 20.5%Biased Writer Voice10.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 4.3%Futurism: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.2%Futurism: 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.6%Futurism: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

440 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech348writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDakota Dominguez • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDakota Dominguez • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBonnie Kate Wolf • 28 words • 100.0% coverageBonnie Kate Wolf • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBonnie Kate Wolf • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBonnie Kate Wolf • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bonnie Kate Wolf

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words58% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+52.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bonnie Kate Wolf: 52.8%52.8%Quote-first Misdirection+52.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bonnie Kate Wolf: 52.8%52.8%Biased Writer Voice-13.2 ptsWriter: 13.2%Bonnie Kate Wolf: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Bonnie Kate Wolf: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.