Futurism88%

Hackers Expose How AI Music App Suno Stole Decades Worth of Copyrighted Music 58%

By Maggie Harrison Dupré80%

7/17/2026, 6:46:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,260 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the article peer group.

A hack revealed in detail how AI music generating app Suno scraped millions of songs, likely including copyrighted ones, from across the web to feed into its AI model, 404 Media reports . 
Suno , which is currently embroiled in multiple ongoing copyright lawsuits, has already admitted in response to legal action that it used “essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet” to train its music-generating AI. 
According to 404 , the hack shed light on how that copyrighted music was obtained and funneled into datasets, with Suno pulling music and lyrics from sites including YouTube Music, Genius, and Deezer, in addition to stock music libraries like Jamendo, Freesound, Pond5, and the International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP). 
Source code obtained by the hacker also pointed to the staggering scale at which Suno has swallowed up music from across the web. 
For instance, one file, titled “youtube_music,” contained “2,013,545 music clips,” while another file noted that Suno’s AI datasets held “113,879 hours of youtube_music.” 
Altogether, the file appears to host hundreds of thousands of hours of music. 
The hacker, who goes by the pseudonym ellie.191, also claimed to 404 that they’d also been able to view sensitive Suno user data, including Stripe payment information. 
In a statement, Suno told 404 that “as we have stated in public filings and disclosures, Suno’s AI models have been trained on publicly available music files and related metadata accessible on third-party websites on the open Internet.” 
The company also insisted that its “goal has always been to help people create original new music, not replicate someone else’s.” 
That’s despite tests extensively showing how Suno can easily replicate published music, including the work of well-known artists. 
More on Suno: CEO of Song-Generating AI App Says People “Don’t Enjoy” Making Music With Instruments 
The post Hackers Expose How AI Music App Suno Stole Decades Worth of Copyrighted Music appeared first on Futurism . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.4%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 7.6%Futurism: 6.1%Confirmation Bias21.4%This article: 12.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.1%Futurism: 1.6%Anchoring Bias12.2%This article: 20.5%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.3%Futurism: 6.2%Availability Heuristic20.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.5%Futurism: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.8%Futurism: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.1%Futurism: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.7%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.1%Futurism: 11.3%Framing Effect23.7%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.2%Futurism: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.4%Futurism: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.9%Futurism: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.5%Futurism: 4.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 61.1%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 15.7%Futurism: 22.5%Negativity Bias61.1%This article: 17.5%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.7%Futurism: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias17.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.6%Futurism: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.4%Futurism: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.9%Futurism: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.8%Futurism: 2.1%Recency Bias4.7%This article: 6.8%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.2%Futurism: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.5%Futurism: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.1%Futurism: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 38.6%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 10.1%Futurism: 6.8%Appeal to Authority38.6%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.2%Futurism: 2.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.2%Futurism: 2.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 7.6%Futurism: 10.5%Hasty Generalization19.0%This article: 4.7%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.6%Futurism: 1.0%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.1%Futurism: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 8.7%Futurism: 9.5%Appeal to Emotion12.2%This article: 11.3%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.8%Futurism: 1.5%Begging the Question11.3%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.8%Futurism: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 6.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Tu Quoque6.2%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.0%Futurism: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.8%Futurism: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 4.2%Futurism: 4.4%Anecdotal8.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.7%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 1.7%Futurism: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.7%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.7%Futurism: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.2%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.1%Futurism: 0.3%Special Pleading6.2%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 36.8%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.9%Futurism: 3.9%Unattributed Quote36.8%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 2.9%Futurism: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 10.4%Futurism: 20.7%Biased Writer Voice16.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 4.2%Futurism: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.2%Futurism: 2.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 0.0%Futurism: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Maggie Harrison Dupré: 3.9%Futurism: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.8%

337 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech186writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageSuno • 41 words • 100.0% coverage404 Media • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageSuno • 38 words • 100.0% coverageSuno • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Suno

100%flagged-word coverage
100 attributed words66% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote+54.8 ptsWriter: 24.2%Suno: 79.0%79.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.0 ptsWriter: 29.0%Suno: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -17.7 ptsWriter: 17.7%Suno: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.