BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 578 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,460 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the article peer group.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP)  The United States and Iran reached an initial agreement Monday that would extend their shaky ceasefire and lead to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, but significant challenges remain to ending the war, including whether Israel will continue its offensive in Lebanon. 
Details of the deal were not immediately released, but it appeared that it would not be implemented until it is signed, which mediator Pakistan said would happen Friday in Geneva. 
Even if the strait  a crucial waterway for the world’s oil and natural gas  fully opens then, it will likely take months for the global energy crisis sparked by its closure to ease. 
Israel’s defense minister said Monday that the country wouldn’t withdraw from land seized in Lebanon, where Israel is fighting the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militant group. 
Israel joined the U.S. in launching the war on Feb. 28, but it is not party to the deal. 
A spokesman in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said Israel will continue to defend itself against any threat to its security. 
But the agreement also faces other major challenges. 
It gives just 60 days to decide what to do about Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium and its nuclear program  which the U.S. and Israel worry could be used to build an atomic weapon, despite Tehran’s insistence that it is peaceful. 
It took years for Iran and world powers to negotiate a 2015 agreement to rein in Tehran’s nuclear program. 
Trump, who faced pressure to end the war ahead of congressional midterm elections in November, hailed the agreement on social media, saying he had authorized the Strait of Hormuz to open and the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports to end. 
He later said the strait wouldn’t open until Friday. 
Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, confirmed the agreement on state television but said Iran would not start implementing it until it was signed. 
Early in the war, Iranian attacks on ships brought traffic in the crucial waterway  through which a fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas passed before the conflict  to a near standstill. 
Trump implemented a blockade in response. 
The closure of the strait, Iranian attacks on Gulf energy infrastructure and the blockade sent fuel prices skyrocketing, and the knock-on effects rippled through the world economy. 
Energy experts say it will likely take months before energy companies can resume operations to the point of meeting the world’s demand. 
Iranian and U.S. officials will hold preparatory meetings in Doha, Qatar, this week before the signing, said a diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door meetings. 
Despite the uncertainties, world leaders from Europe to China welcomed the agreement. 
French President Emmanuel Macron, who is hosting Trump and other world leaders at a Group of Seven summit this week, said France and other Western partners are “ready to take action very quickly” to help restore normal shipping traffic in the strait once the U.S. and Iran agree to such a mission. 
“We already have forces in the area,” including France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, Macron said in an interview Monday on French television TF1. 
Others have expressed caution that the deal remains tentative. 
Luxembourg’s foreign minister, Xavier Bettel, noted: “It’s a long time till Friday.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.6%Jon Gambrell: 2.0%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias12.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic15.9%This article: 3.3%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 19.4%Jon Gambrell: 10.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect19.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.1%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias11.1%This article: 7.6%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 18.0%Jon Gambrell: 11.1%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias18.0%This article: 10.6%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Jon Gambrell: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.2%This article: 4.5%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 3.3%Jon Gambrell: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.1%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon2.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 5.0%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.4%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote20.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

578 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers37%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coveragePakistan • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBenjamin Netanyahu’s office • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 40 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKazem Gharibabadi • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 52 words • 0.0% coverageEmmanuel Macron • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageXavier Bettel • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words23% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Politically Right Leaning +81.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 81.6%81.6%Unattributed Quote-19.0 ptsWriter: 19.0%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.