BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Burden of Proof, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 477 faulty-reasoning hits from 482 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.4% and a BS Rank of 25% (15,918 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the article peer group.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP)  Iran’s top diplomat said Tuesday that the tentative deal to end the war with the United States would require Israel to withdraw from Lebanon  a condition Israel has already rejected and that could sink the agreement, leading to the resumption of all-out war. 
The deal, which is between the U.S. and Iran, has not been made public, and officials have sometimes offered contradictory interpretations of what is in it. 
While Israel is not party to the agreement, it is part of the war after joining the U.S. in launching strikes on Iran on Feb. 
28. 
Israel also has fought the Iran-backed Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon and seized large swaths of that country. 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Israel’s continued occupation of southern Lebanon would violate the deal. 
“Without the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territories they occupied during this war, the war has not fully come to an end,” Araghchi said. 
Switzerland’s foreign ministry said the signing ceremony for the deal will take place Friday at the Bürgenstock resort near the city of Luzern. 
Other major questions hang over the planned ceremonial signing. 
The agreement is meant to provide a meaningful truce in a monthslong war that has killed thousands across the Middle East and raised the prices of fuel, food and other basic goods far beyond the region. 
The agreement provides for the “immediate” opening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lifting of the American naval blockade of Iranian ports, according to a senior U.S. official who spoke to reporters Monday on condition of anonymity to discuss outlines of the agreement. 
Trump later said the United States would not “invest” funds in Iran. 
U.S. officials have not yet explained how they see the agreement addressing Iran’s nuclear program, including who will be in charge of verifying that Iran is in compliance and who will destroy or remove highly enriched uranium believed to be buried under nuclear sites that were badly damaged by U.S. strikes last summer. 
Iran has agreed to discuss ways to possibly “dilute or remove” the uranium, the regional officials said. 
However, it remains unclear whether Tehran would agree to that, particularly with hard-liners opposed. 
Trump said he’s open to sending the emerging agreement to the U.S. 
Congress for review. 
Republicans on Capitol Hill say they want Trump to provide more information about the agreement, with some expressing skepticism that the deal can deter Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon. 
___ 
Metz reported from Ramallah, West Bank, and Magdy reported from Cairo. 
Associated Press writers Julia Frankel and Koral Saeed in Jerusalem, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad, Michelle L. 
Price and Konstantin Toropin in Washington, Aamer Madhani in Geneva, Darlene Superville in Evian-les-Bains, France, and Edith M. 
Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.9%Jon Gambrell: 2.0%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias13.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.7%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias9.1%This article: 7.9%Jon Gambrell: 10.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.9%This article: 18.5%Jon Gambrell: 11.1%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias18.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.5%Jon Gambrell: 5.0%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 5.2%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 3.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof11.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.1%Jon Gambrell: 3.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote9.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

482 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers16%attributed speech406writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSwitzerland’s foreign ministry • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abbas Araghchi

61%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words54% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-10.8 ptsWriter: 10.8%Abbas Araghchi: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.