BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 830 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,528 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has approved major disaster declaration requests for at least seven states, according to information released Saturday by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, allowing affected communities to access federal support. 
About 15 requests for assistance from others states and tribes for extreme weather events this year and last seem to be pending, along with three appeals of previous denials. 
Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota and Washington were granted major disaster declarations, which can unlock federal support and funding for recovery needs such as public infrastructure repairs and aid for survivors. 
Mullin said Tuesday that he planned to brief Trump that day on the pending declaration requests, affirming his intention to speed up work on past disasters in the run-up to Atlantic hurricane season, which begins June 1. 
While Mullin assured fellow senators during his confirmation hearing that he believed in FEMA’s mission, the agency’s future is uncertain. 
Trump has expressed a desire to push more responsibility for disasters down to states. 
The FEMA Review Council he appointed last year has not released a recommendation report expected to include sweeping changes to how the federal government supports disaster resilience, response and recovery. 
It was not immediately clear whether other states or tribes had also been told of approvals or denials that were not yet announced publicly. 
Hawaii Governor Josh Green, a Democrat, said Wednesday said his state had received a disaster declaration for devastating March flooding. 
Trump also amended past disaster declarations for Tennessee and Mississippi, adding more counties for individual assistance after a severe winter storm in January. 
Some communities have experienced unprecedented long waits for answers on their disaster requests during Trump’s second term. 
An analysis by The Associated Press in September found approvals were taking more than a month on average. 
It took less than two weeks on average for a governor’s disaster declaration request to be granted by presidents in the 1990s and early 2000s. 
That rose to about three weeks during the past decade under presidents from both major parties. 
Arizona has been waiting nearly three months for an answer to its appeal after being denied support for severe storms and flooding that occurred in September. 
Some Democrat-led states have complained about being denied disaster declarations despite proving need. 
Maryland Gov. 
Wes Moore called Trump’s decision “deeply frustrating” after the president twice denied the state’s request for support for May 2025 flooding despite a FEMA assessment showing over $33 million in damages. 
While FEMA assesses damage and uses a specific formula to analyze the possible impact on states and local jurisdictions, disaster declarations are ultimately at the president’s discretion. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.1%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 5.5%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 2.1%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias5.5%This article: 7.8%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 2.2%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.8%This article: 3.5%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.6%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 3.5%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.5%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.6%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.6%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 2.5%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias14.6%This article: 4.4%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.5%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias4.4%This article: 16.6%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 6.7%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.4%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 10.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias10.0%This article: 7.3%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 2.3%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.1%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.8%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority11.1%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.8%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 4.4%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring4.4%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.8%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 2.9%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.4%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.4%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 39.2%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 4.5%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)39.2%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.3%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.9%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 1.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.9%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%GABRIELA AOUN ANGUEIRA: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

451 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers15%attributed speech382writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Green • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWes Moore • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Wes Moore

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words45% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Wes Moore: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Wes Moore: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.