Legislators Warned That States Must Talk Or Face Lawsuits Over Colorado River 30%

By Mark Heinz64%

8/6/2026, 5:26:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 704 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of 30% (21,631 of 30,558 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the article peer group.

As demands increase for a dwindling supply of Colorado River water, the seven states that depend upon the river must keep talking to avoid lawsuits or federal intervention, Wyoming State Engineer Brandon Gebhart told lawmakers Thursday. 
As it stands, there are rumblings that legal battles between states are imminent, Rep. 
Ken Chestek, D-Laramie, said during a meeting of the Legislature’s Select Water Committee in Cheyenne. 
Gebhart appeared before the committee to give an update on Colorado River water. 
His remarks were informational and the committee took no action. 
“I’ve heard talk about possible litigation between the Lower Basin states and the Upper Basin states, based on the recent federal EIS,” Chestek said while asking Gebhart his thoughts about the possibility. 
“The best way to avoid it (litigation) is to get to an agreement among the seven states,” Gebhart answered. 
"Wyoming remains fully committed to that. 
I truly believe a seven-state agreement is much better than litigation or congressional intervention. 
Any time an EIS comes out, there is a potential for a whole host of folks or people or organizations to file suit.” 
But it’s too early to tell whether that could turn into lawsuits between states, he added. 
“I don’t have a crystal ball. 
But I’m going to continue to try very hard to avoid that outcome. 
I don’t believe it’s the best,” said Gebhart, who represents Wyoming on the Upper Colorado River Commission. 
Water Pulled From Flaming Gorge 
The U.S. 
Department of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation, recently released its final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Colorado River operations, including plans for operations from 2027 to 2036. 
That proposal doesn’t include any immediate cuts for the Upper Basin states: Wyoming, Colorado, Utah and New Mexico. 
In the Lower Basin, Arizona Gov. 
Katie Hobbs said her state faces “Draconian” cuts under the plan. 
The other Lower Basin States are Nevada and California. 
Independent of federal moves, Wyoming is implementing voluntary water conservation measures in the upper Green River Basin, Gebhart said. 
The Green River is one of the Colorado River’s primary tributaries, and feeds into Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the Wyoming-Utah state line. 
A plan is still on track to pull an additional 1 million acre-feet from Flaming Gorge, from May to April 2027, to make up for shortages at Lake Powell on the Utah-Arizona state line, Gebhart said. 
As of mid-July, about 239,000 acre-feet had been pulled from Flaming Gorge, he said. 
Two-Year Plans 
The federal government is expected to release a record of a decision that would establish direction over operations, according to two-year operational plans, Gebhart said. 
That would start with a 2027-2028 plan. 
“We’re being told that these will come soon, but we are not provided a definition of what ‘soon’ is," Gebhart said. 
Regarding perceptions of the “fairness” of the EIS as it applies to the Upper Basin versus Lower Basin, he said it’s important to remember the sections are managed differently. 
In the Lower Basin, the Secretary of the Interior has direct control over reservoir releases and water deliveries, Gebhart said. 
In the Upper Basin, policy is decided mostly by state law and according to water supplies, he said. 
“I believe we should avoid measuring fairness by whether the action looks identical," Gebhart said. 
"Fairness is whether each basin is contributing through the authorities, responsibilities, operational tools and water supplies that actually exist.” 
Grim Water Year 
This has been one of the lowest water years on record across much of the West, Gebhart said, and Wyoming has been no exception. 
“Over 83% of the state is in severe or extreme drought,” he said. 
"Luckily, no parts of the state are under exceptional drought, as of right now.” 
For the entire Colorado River basin, the supply remains low. 
The 10-year average flow at Lees Ferry in Arizona was recently measured at roughly 81 million acre-feet, Gebhart said. 
Lees Ferry is considered the dividing line between the Upper and Lower Basins. 
“The Lower Basin believes that it’s entitled to about 82.5 million acre-feet under the 1922 Colorado river compact. 
So, we will be dipping below what they think they’re entitled to under the compact,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Mark Heinz: 2.7%Cowboy State Daily: 2.1%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 6.5%Mark Heinz: 0.8%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Anchoring Bias6.5%This article: 7.8%Mark Heinz: 5.7%Cowboy State Daily: 1.8%Availability Heuristic7.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Mark Heinz: 2.4%Cowboy State Daily: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 6.3%Mark Heinz: 3.9%Cowboy State Daily: 2.2%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 1.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.5%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Mark Heinz: 3.0%Cowboy State Daily: 1.4%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 6.5%Mark Heinz: 4.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.9%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 8.7%Mark Heinz: 3.7%Cowboy State Daily: 2.6%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 6.0%Mark Heinz: 3.6%Cowboy State Daily: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Mark Heinz: 3.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.4%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 1.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Mark Heinz: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 2.7%Cowboy State Daily: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.1%Mark Heinz: 3.0%Cowboy State Daily: 1.9%Appeal to Authority13.1%This article: 4.4%Mark Heinz: 3.6%Cowboy State Daily: 1.3%False Dilemma4.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 4.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.3%Mark Heinz: 2.7%Cowboy State Daily: 2.4%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.0%Mark Heinz: 5.0%Cowboy State Daily: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 4.5%Mark Heinz: 2.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Begging the Question4.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Mark Heinz: 0.5%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 1.9%Cowboy State Daily: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.4%Mark Heinz: 1.8%Cowboy State Daily: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.1%Mark Heinz: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Middle Ground4.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Mark Heinz: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.0%Mark Heinz: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 2.7%Mark Heinz: 0.8%Cowboy State Daily: 1.8%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 3.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Heinz: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

704 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers64%attributed speech250writer words
Selected voice

Katie Hobbs

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words2.4% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Katie Hobbs: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.6 ptsWriter: 5.6%Katie Hobbs: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.