Lindsay Clancy’s diary chronicled desperation and ‘brain fog’ before she killed her 3 kids 29%

By The Associated Press73%

8/2/2026, 5:06:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 932 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,970 of 29,339 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the article peer group.

By MICHAEL CASEY 
PLYMOUTH, Mass. 
(AP)  After an opening week of wrenching testimony and a jury trip to the home where Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children, her murder trial resumed Monday with diary entries from the months leading up to the killings in a coastal Massachusetts town in 2023. 
Clancy described feeling anxious and overwhelmed with motherhood, including her struggles to get her newborn Callan to sleep and constant worries of his being sick. 
She also expressed concerns about going back to work as a labor and delivery nurse, not being able to breastfeed, and feeling disconnected from her children and her then-husband. 
“I’m so desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone that my mind is trying to find something physically wrong with me,” she wrote in a Nov. 18, 2022, entry. 
Clancy's defense says she was a loving mother who was overmastered by postpartum psychosis, a dangerous psychiatric condition that afflicts a small proportion of women after childbirth and affects their hold on reality. 
Prosecutors contend that she acted intentionally and should be held criminally responsible for the deaths of Callan, Dawson and Cora Clancy, who ranged in age from 8 months to 5 years. 
___ 
EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. 
If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988. 
Clancy's lawyers don't dispute that she killed the children. 
But in the criminal trial and a medical malpractice lawsuit, her attorneys say the 35-year-old had bipolar disorder that wasn't fully diagnosed until after the killings. 
Her attorneys say her condition seemed to worsen on an ever-shifting lineup of psychiatric prescriptions, some of them problematic for bipolar patients. 
Her diary sheds light on the mental health issues at the heart of the case 
In the three months before the killings, various clinicians prescribed a range of antidepressants, sleep aids, an antipsychotic and other medications while she reported increasingly profound insomnia, anxiety, despair and confusion about what was real, according to her lawsuit. 
Both the prosecution and her defense attorney read pages from her journal Monday as she chronicled those difficult months. 
“I want help. 
I want to be well,” Clancy's attorney Kevin Reddington read from one journal entry. 
She also wrote of feeling “incredibly sad and guilty” about not breastfeeding and was “obsessed” with Callan's sleep and nap schedule. 
“I have crazy brain fog. 
I feel like I can’t make a plan,” she wrote in another, undated entry. 
“I live moment to moment waiting for the next nap time. 
I’m terrified of Cal getting overtired now because I feel can’t help him.” 
In separate lawsuits, Lindsay and ex-husband Patrick Clancy allege that various providers failed her, and should have recognized she was a risk to herself and the children. 
The providers, at least those who have responded to date, deny the allegations and dispute that she clearly told them she intended to harm the kids. 
Lindsay Clancy was seeking help before the killings 
When she sought care at a postpartum depression program in late December 2022, providers noted that her symptoms might be due to medication, according to her lawsuit. 
It says those clinicians told her to taper off the antipsychotic drug and then discharged her after a day. 
Clancy checked herself into a psychiatric hospital that New Year's Eve and spent several days there. 
Once home, she resumed appointments with her psychiatrist, who last saw her for 17 minutes on Jan. 23, 2023, according to her lawsuit. 
The next day, she believed a commanding voice was telling her to “kill the children so you can kill yourself,” according to her lawyers. 
That evening, she asked her then-husband to run some errands, a request that prosecutors cast as a ploy to get him out of the house. 
Father returns home to a shocking scene 
Lindsay Clancy wept at the defense table last week as Patrick Clancy and other witnesses testified. 
He told jurors about returning to a horrible scene at their house: a bloodied bedroom, an open window, his wife on the ground below it, the children in the basement, throttled with exercise bands. 
“She killed the kids!” 
he told a 911 dispatcher on a call played in court. 
Lindsay Clancy remains paralyzed from the waist down because of the fall. 
In the hospital two days later, when a forensic psychologist asked Clancy how she felt, she responded: “horrified.” 
She also asked if she had a lawyer and whether her body and legs were broken. 
She was intubated and could only communicate through written messages on a whiteboard, the psychologist testified. 
“She then asked, can she have visitors, and where her family is,” Dr. 
Jhilam Biswas of Brigham and Women’s Hospital recalled. 
Doctors testified Monday that 8-month-old Callan was in cardiac arrest when he arrived at a hospital in nearby Plymouth. 
He needed a ventilator at Boston Children’s Hospital to help him breathe, but did have a heartbeat. 
He died after three days. 
Prosecutors will try to keep the spotlight on Clancy 
Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham sought in an opening statement last week to keep jurors’ focus on the defendant, not her doctors. 
“This is not a public debate about women’s mental health and how the medical system treats women,” Buckingham said. 
If convicted of murder, Lindsay Clancy faces life in prison without parole. 
If found not guilty due to a lack of criminal responsibility, she would be committed to a state mental health facility. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.1%The Associated Press: 2.2%Hartford Courant: 1.6%Confirmation Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%The Associated Press: 2.4%Hartford Courant: 1.6%Availability Heuristic12.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.7%The Associated Press: 8.4%Hartford Courant: 2.2%Framing Effect18.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%The Associated Press: 2.4%Hartford Courant: 2.2%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.3%The Associated Press: 8.6%Hartford Courant: 3.6%Negativity Bias19.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%Hartford Courant: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%The Associated Press: 0.9%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 1.9%The Associated Press: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.6%Hartford Courant: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.5%Hartford Courant: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%The Associated Press: 1.6%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 4.9%The Associated Press: 0.3%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%The Associated Press: 0.7%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Ad Hominem2.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 2.9%Hartford Courant: 0.9%Appeal to Authority5.9%This article: 7.6%The Associated Press: 0.9%Hartford Courant: 0.4%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%The Associated Press: 2.4%Hartford Courant: 1.3%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.4%The Associated Press: 0.4%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Bandwagon0.4%This article: 8.9%The Associated Press: 4.2%Hartford Courant: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.3%The Associated Press: 2.1%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%Hartford Courant: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%The Associated Press: 1.3%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.5%The Associated Press: 1.5%Hartford Courant: 1.1%Unattributed Quote7.5%This article: 5.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 6.1%The Associated Press: 2.9%Hartford Courant: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice6.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

932 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers17%attributed speech776writer words
49%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words25% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.