9to5Mac74%

iPhone 17 Pro found ‘pristine’ after surviving fall from airplane 45%

By Ryan Christoffel64%

7/31/2026, 11:04:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 428 faulty-reasoning hits from 300 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of 45% (15,358 of 27,663 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the article peer group.

When iPhone 17 Pro launched, Apple touted the device’s improved durability. 
One user just put that claim to the test—unintentionally—and came away shocked after her iPhone 17 Pro survived an airplane fall unscathed. 
iPhone 17 Pro with no case fell 1.1km out of airplane and came away unscathed 
Have you ever accidentally dropped your iPhone from the passenger seat of a plane? 
It’s certainly not advisable. 
But if you do, you might be surprised how well the device survives. 
Per a new video report shared by CBC, Heather Cline was recently seated as a passenger in the plane her husband was flying in Saskatchewan when her iPhone took an unfortunate dive. 
The iPhone 17 Pro was in a case initially, but per Cline, “the airstream sucked the phone right out of the case.” 
From there, it fell out of the airplane and dropped 1.1 kilometers (or about 2/3 of a mile). 
Though they might have otherwise considered it lost, the couple saw that the iPhone was still showing up on Find My. 
So they decided to go search for it. 
And when they found it, face-up in a canola field, it was “pristine.” 
Here’s the full story via Instagram: 
To be fair, for every amazing story of the iPhone’s durability, there are also plenty of reports of enduring damage after a short fall from a pocket. 
Regardless, Cline’s story is an impressive testament to the hardware quality of Apple products. 
Do you have your own story of iPhone durability—or the lack thereof? 
Let us know in the comments. 
Best iPhone accessories 
AirPods Pro 3 (now only $199, down from $249) 
MagSafe Car Mount for iPhone 
10-year AirTag battery case 
100W USB-C fast charging power adapter 
AirTag 2 (1-pack / 4-pack) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Ryan Christoffel: 2.0%9to5Mac: 3.0%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Ryan Christoffel: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 5.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.0%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.9%9to5Mac: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Ryan Christoffel: 3.2%9to5Mac: 4.3%Framing Effect3.0%This article: 7.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.3%9to5Mac: 1.1%Loss Aversion7.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Ryan Christoffel: 6.0%9to5Mac: 3.2%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 1.3%Ryan Christoffel: 0.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.3%This article: 16.3%Ryan Christoffel: 1.3%9to5Mac: 3.8%Negativity Bias16.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.7%9to5Mac: 2.7%Halo Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Ryan Christoffel: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.5%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 3.7%9to5Mac: 2.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.5%9to5Mac: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Ryan Christoffel: 2.4%9to5Mac: 4.5%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.6%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.2%9to5Mac: 1.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.9%9to5Mac: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 35.0%Ryan Christoffel: 2.2%9to5Mac: 2.3%Anecdotal35.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 1.3%9to5Mac: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.0%Ryan Christoffel: 4.4%9to5Mac: 2.2%Unattributed Quote18.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 4.3%9to5Mac: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.7%9to5Mac: 1.4%Indoctrination6.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Christoffel: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Ryan Christoffel: 11.4%9to5Mac: 13.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.7%

300 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers18%attributed speech246writer words
Selected voice

CBC

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words59% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%CBC: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%CBC: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%CBC: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.