Letter to the Editor: Apartment Vacancy Rates Paint an Incomplete Picture 87%

By David Malcolm0%

7/16/2026, 9:36:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 528 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,816 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the article peer group.

David Malcolm is the president of Cal West Apartments, Inc. 
In last Saturday’s  Politics Report ,” Will Huntsberry tackled the thorny issue of apartment vacancy rates (apparently the highest in this century) and the impact on affordability. 
He also correctly wrote that the city of San Diego needs “strategies beyond build, build, build.” 
What’s Really Happening 
My company owns and operates apartment rental complexes in San Diego County (San Marcos, Encinitas, La Jolla, El Cajon and South Bay) and in Temecula (Riverside County). 
Here is what we are seeing. 
Base rents are stable  but offers of two months’ free rent are common. 
That is a de facto 16.7 percent reduction on annualized rents. 
Reducing base rents is not possible in the face of rent control measures and, even more importantly, bank loan covenants. 
Thus, concessions like two months’ free rent are not hard to find. 
In Temecula, projects next to ours offer two or even three months’ free rent. 
In the city of San Diego, you see these offers in precisely the locations where apartment buildings have proliferated  Downtown, Mission Valley, Hillcrest, Bankers Hill and North Park for example. 
This means that the impetus to build more apartment units has increased affordability and real rents are down. 
Mission Accomplished? 
I say the city should declare a victory for having increased supply  and take a step back from “build, baby, build!” 
By taking a step back, I mean being less knee-jerk and more about striking the right balance before San Diego becomes Los Angeles, sacrificing community character in the process. 
The rush to build, build, build has already resulted in unintended consequences. 
Take parking as one example. 
Reducing requirements from one or two spaces per unit to no parking whatsoever means that streets will forever be lined with parked cars  and people with special needs are not-so-subtly told, “Don’t apply here.” 
What has San Diego become when we aren’t willing to make room for those with special needs? 
For many projects not a single Handicapped parking space is required. 
Let’s Get Back to Striking the Right Balance 
How does San Diego get back to accommodating demand without throwing community character out the window, so to speak? 
By encouraging developers to build the right product in the right places. 
Transit-oriented development is just one example of that. 
By getting back to considering architectural qualities, height considerations, impacts on wetlands and other environmental assets, and by making sure the appropriate infrastructure is in place or planned. 
That means everything from roads to water and sewer to parks to schools to grocery stores. 
And here’s a thought. 
One good way to do that is by listening to the community planning groups who are the boots on the ground of the communities themselves. 
San Diego has not been doing that and it is to our detriment. 
But it can and must be turned around. 
Let’s shift the conversation from build everything, everywhere, all at once (apologies to the Academy Award-winning Best Picture) to thoughtful, comprehensive “communities planning” before jeopardizing San Diego’s greatest asset; our quality of life. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.1%David Malcolm: 8.5%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Confirmation Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%David Malcolm: 4.9%Voice of San Diego: 2.7%Availability Heuristic14.6%This article: 8.5%David Malcolm: 2.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic8.5%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%David Malcolm: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 24.4%David Malcolm: 12.4%Voice of San Diego: 6.0%Framing Effect24.4%This article: 6.3%David Malcolm: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Loss Aversion6.3%This article: 10.6%David Malcolm: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Status Quo Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%David Malcolm: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 2.9%Optimism Bias10.6%This article: 18.8%David Malcolm: 6.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Pessimism Bias18.8%This article: 17.6%David Malcolm: 8.7%Voice of San Diego: 9.0%Negativity Bias17.6%This article: 5.1%David Malcolm: 9.7%Voice of San Diego: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 3.8%David Malcolm: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%David Malcolm: 3.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%In-Group Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.7%David Malcolm: 7.4%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Appeal to Authority9.7%This article: 13.3%David Malcolm: 10.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%False Dilemma13.3%This article: 12.1%David Malcolm: 14.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Slippery Slope12.1%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.4%David Malcolm: 16.8%Voice of San Diego: 4.1%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.4%David Malcolm: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Bandwagon0.4%This article: 24.4%David Malcolm: 20.2%Voice of San Diego: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion24.4%This article: 2.3%David Malcolm: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 13.8%David Malcolm: 8.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.8%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.2%David Malcolm: 2.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Burden of Proof7.2%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.0%David Malcolm: 1.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Composition/Division3.0%This article: 15.7%David Malcolm: 9.0%Voice of San Diego: 2.4%Anecdotal15.7%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%David Malcolm: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%David Malcolm: 2.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Middle Ground7.2%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.3%David Malcolm: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Special Pleading5.3%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%David Malcolm: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 5.3%David Malcolm: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.3%This article: 29.7%David Malcolm: 15.4%Voice of San Diego: 6.4%Biased Writer Voice29.7%This article: 20.5%David Malcolm: 15.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Indoctrination20.5%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Malcolm: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%David Malcolm: 1.7%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.1%

528 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers10%attributed speech474writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Malcolm • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWill Huntsberry • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWill Huntsberry • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Will Huntsberry

100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words81% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Quote-first Misdirection+63.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Will Huntsberry: 63.6%63.6%Biased Writer Voice+6.6 ptsWriter: 29.7%Will Huntsberry: 36.4%36.4%Indoctrination-22.8 ptsWriter: 22.8%Will Huntsberry: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Will Huntsberry: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Will Huntsberry: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.