School Construction Bond Déjà Vu 55%

By Voice of San Diego31%

7/9/2026, 2:15:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,898 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

Remember four years ago when the San Diego Unified School District asked taxpayers to pony up $3.2 billion in bond financing for urgently needed repairs to city schools? 
And four years before that, when the district asked for… the same thing? 
Well, we’re back again  and not much has changed. 
As our Jakob McWhinney reports, San Diego Unified’s latest $3.5 billion bond proposal slated to appear on the November ballot includes many of the same old projects  including the exact same photos of decrepit facilities used for earlier bonds. 
Why the broken record routine? 
As McWhinney writes, “If the bond pitch ain’t broke, don’t fix it. 
Ironic, no?” 
Also in McWhinney’s Learning Curve newsletter: A priceless (or is it $500,000?) 
moment of robotic brown nosing. 
Read The Learning Curve here. 
Chula Vista PD Killed the Vibe 
As you may have seen, the vibe in Chula Vista has been incredible after all of Mexico’s wins in the World Cup. 
People hit the streets to dance, cut up and have a good time. 
On Sunday, Mexico lost to England  down with the crown!  but, even after the loss, the vibes appeared just as high. 
People spilled onto Third Avenue, where a general sense of celebration seemed to prevail. 
Cops told the crowd to disperse. 
When people didn’t leave, officers began to fire pepper-spray projectiles. 
You can see video from ABC 10 here . 
Cops, however, say the scene wasn’t all peace and love. 
They say some in the crowd threw bottles, set off fireworks and blocked police cars. 
They also say a police car was damaged by the crowd. 
A picture shared with ABC 10 shows a small dent. 
“God forbid some Mexicans try to catch a vibe,” wrote Chula Vistan Nicko Savala on Instagram . 
CV Explores Hotel Tax Increase 
The city of Chula Vista is eyeing hotel guests as a new source of revenue. 
The city recently hired a polling firm to test support for a possible November ballot measure that would raise the city’s hotel tax rate to among the highest in San Diego County. 
City Councilmember Jose Preciado, who spearheaded the proposed tax increase, said he hopes the new revenue will pay for additional police officers and a new visitors bureau to market the city as a tourism destination. 
But wait: The City Council hasn’t even discussed the plan, much less decided to put it on the ballot. 
Yet, already there’s a deep-pocketed opponent. 
A major labor union that’s sponsoring a separate ballot measure in Chula Vista came out in opposition Wednesday  in part fearing that asking voters to weigh in on two complex government-related ballot measures could cause them to reject both. 
“Now is not a time for tax increases,” the union’s leader said. 
Read the full story here. 
Meet the Beat Tonight 
Today’s the day to meet the journalist behind Voice’s much-loved North County Report: Tigist Layne! 
Join us for a discussion about Layne’s latest investigations and bring your questions for an open audience Q&A, moderated by Managing Editor Andrea Sanchez-Villafaña 
Join us today, July 9, from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at La Colonia Community Center in Solana Beach. 
This event is free and open to the public. 
RSVP here . 
In Other News 
The San Diego City Council on Tuesday voted unanimously to spend nearly $400,000 to buy a robotic police vehicle that police officials said they will use to de-escalate dangerous situations, rescue people trapped in buildings and safely approach active shooters. 
(Union-Tribune) 
In other robot news: Waymo, the driverless taxi company, plans to begin testing driverless taxis on San Diego city streets later this month. 
The company already has been testing driverless taxis with a driver supervising behind the wheel. 
(KPBS) 
Residents of southeastern San Diego on Tuesday lost a bid to block plans for 123 houses in the Emerald Hill area. 
The City Council rejected an appeal from community members to stop the housing development on land residents called a community oasis. 
(KPBS) 
The National City Council recently approved a series of projects intended to beautify and improve safety on city streets. 
Projects include mini traffic circles, bicycle lanes, sewer improvements and a pedestrian rail crossing. (inewsource) 
Despite a difficult budget year, the city of San Diego spent nearly $30,000 to send an emergency response helicopter to Newport Beach in Orange County to assist in a search for the missing son of a retired Fire-Rescue Department leader. 
The missing son was later found “chilling at his apartment.” 
(Union-Tribune) 
It looks like a horror movie. 
It’s actually folk art. 
Welcome to Dead Dolly Lane , a long and winding private driveway in Alpine lined with…well, you just have to see the photos for yourself. 
(Times of San Diego) 
The Morning Report was written by Jim Hinch and Will Huntsberry. 
It was edited by Will Huntsberry. 
The post School Construction Bond Déjà Vu appeared first on Voice of San Diego . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Voice of San Diego: 2.2%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 3.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 5.1%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 9.7%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic9.7%This article: 3.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Voice of San Diego: 8.8%Voice of San Diego: 6.1%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 3.0%Optimism Bias12.2%This article: 1.9%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 23.9%Voice of San Diego: 9.2%Voice of San Diego: 9.1%Negativity Bias23.9%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 1.5%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.1%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.1%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 3.0%Appeal to Authority8.1%This article: 2.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 3.2%Voice of San Diego: 4.2%Hasty Generalization3.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.4%Voice of San Diego: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.9%Voice of San Diego: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.2%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.2%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 2.3%Anecdotal12.2%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.6%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.6%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Unattributed Quote18.8%This article: 5.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 31.9%Voice of San Diego: 9.4%Voice of San Diego: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice31.9%This article: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Indoctrination1.8%This article: 4.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.8%

828 words analyzed.

Speakers

12speakers27%attributed speech604writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJakob McWhinney • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJakob McWhinney • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNicko Savala • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJose Preciado • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSan Diego City Council • 40 words • 100.0% coverageUnion-Tribune • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKPBS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCity Council • 21 words • 100.0% coverageKPBS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageNational City Council • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageUnion-Tribune • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageTimes of San Diego • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJim Hinch • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWill Huntsberry • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVoice of San Diego • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jakob McWhinney

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words23% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Biased Writer Voice+39.8 ptsWriter: 37.1%Jakob McWhinney: 76.9%76.9%Quote-first Misdirection+21.1 ptsWriter: 2.0%Jakob McWhinney: 23.1%23.1%Unattributed Quote+15.1 ptsWriter: 7.9%Jakob McWhinney: 23.1%23.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.9 ptsWriter: 18.9%Jakob McWhinney: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Jakob McWhinney: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Jakob McWhinney: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.