Man’s skeletal remains recovered from Jamaica Bay in Queens by NYPD 18%

By Nicholas Williams56%

5/31/2026, 12:05:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 370 faulty-reasoning hits from 218 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (16,490 of 20,102 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the article peer group.

Police recovered the remains of a man at Jamaica Bay in Queens on Friday morning, cops said. 
The unidentified partially decomposed remains were recovered along the shoreline by the NYPD's Emergency Service Unit around 7:35 a.m. near Beach Channel Dr. and Beach 100th St. in Arverne. 
Skeletal bones were visible as police removed the remains, suggesting the body may have been in the water a long time. 
The location the body was found was right behind Rockaway Park High School for Environmental Sustainability. 
The individual is currently identified. 
The cause of death will be determined by the medical examiner. 
A teen swimmer recently vanished off the Rockaways and his body has not yet been found. 
Brandon Figueroa, 18, who lived in the Bronx, went to Rockaway Beach with some friends Tuesday to beat the sweltering heat, his devastated mother said in an online fundraiser. 
"While enjoying the water, a big wave and a strong riptide pulled Brandon under, and despite the efforts of NYPD, FDNY, and other agencies, his body has not been found," Jeanette Munoz wrote. 
"This unimaginable tragedy has left our family heartbroken and lost for words." 
Figueroa, who lived in Soundview, was reported missing near Beach 73rd St. around 3:31 p.m. 
Tuesday, police said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.1%Nicholas Williams: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Nicholas Williams: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 5.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Nicholas Williams: 8.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 6.2%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Nicholas Williams: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 33.9%Nicholas Williams: 6.6%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion33.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.3%Nicholas Williams: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal13.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.6%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.1%Nicholas Williams: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote15.1%This article: 15.1%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection15.1%This article: 30.7%Nicholas Williams: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice30.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

218 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers47%attributed speech115writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD's Emergency Service Unit • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Figueroa • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJeanette Munoz • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJeanette Munoz • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeanette Munoz

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words44% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Unattributed Quote+73.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeanette Munoz: 73.3%73.3%Quote-first Misdirection+73.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeanette Munoz: 73.3%73.3%Biased Writer Voice+69.0 ptsWriter: 4.3%Jeanette Munoz: 73.3%73.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.