NPR84%

National mood is against Republicans, but redistricting could help prop them up 76%

By Domenico Montanaro0%

5/9/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,190 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,224 of 21,188 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the article peer group.

There's a dichotomy shaping up in this midterm election year. 
The national political landscape could hardly look worse for President Trump and Republicans. 
At the same time, the GOP is suddenly resurgent in the redistricting fight, getting significant wins this week in Virginia and Tennessee that could soften the blow they might have suffered without them. 
The national mood is very much against Republicans right now 
The latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll underscores the headwinds for the GOP. 
Trump has just a 37% approval rating, with 59% disapproving. 
That's the worst score in the Marist poll in either of Trump's terms. 
Fifty-one percent of respondents in the poll said they strongly disapprove of the job Trump is doing, indicating the intensity of opposition Republicans are facing. 
About eight in 10 respondents said gas prices are straining their household budgets, and 63% blame Trump for that increase given the war with Iran. 
Americans largely don't feel the economy is working well for them  63% said so in the latest NPR poll, and Trump is suffering politically for it. 
His economic approval is down to 35% and, on his handling of Iran, just 33% approve. 
There are few things more indicative of midterm results than presidential approval ratings 
Presidents' parties have a hard time in midterms. 
Only twice since World War II has the president's party gained seats in the House  in 1998 Democrats picked up five, and in 2002, after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Republicans netted eight. 
It's a fact that Trump is aware of. 
He's mentioned it several times since being sworn in for this second term. 
"Even when you have a great president, they tend to lose the midterms," Trump said last month on Fox Business. 
"It doesn't make sense to me, so we're going to try turning it around." 
The reason for the disadvantage is midterms are the first national elections in which those aligned with the party out of power can register their frustration. 
Supporters of the president's party often become more complacent after a presidential election, given their preferred party is running things. 
Just how bad has it been over the years? 
Presidents' parties have lost, on average, 25 House seats and four Senate seats during midterm elections since WWII. 
It's even worse when a president is below 50% approval, as Trump is now. 
The average losses in the House jump to 33 when that's the case. 
Showing the disaffection for politics and partisanship in this modern era, each of the last five midterm elections have seen presidents with ratings below 50%. 
(Average net losses in the Senate are not affected by the president's approval rating.) 
Key groups that approved of the job Trump was doing a year ago no longer do 
Trump's unpopularity is evident with voter groups that were key pillars to his 2024 presidential success. 
Compared to February 2025, white voters without college degrees, parents of children who are under 18, those who make less than $50,000 a year and even adults in the South now give a net-negative job approval rating of the president. 
Notably, several crossover groups that swung toward Trump in the 2024 presidential election  such as millennials, Latinos and many younger voters  have also heavily moved away from this president. 
The shifts toward Democrats by white people without college degrees and adults in the South are particularly striking. 
White adults without college degrees voted for Trump by 34 points, according to 2024 exit polls, but are now saying they'll vote for a Republican candidate in their congressional district this fall by just 6 points, according to this week's NPR poll. 
That's a 28-point shift. 
Adults in the South went from voting for Trump by 13 points in 2024 to now saying they're 5 points more likely to vote for a Democratic congressional candidate. 
Democrats also have the edge on enthusiasm 
Midterm elections have had, on average, a 30% dropoff in turnout from the previous presidential election year, going back to 1992. 
So enthusiasm and activism are even more important in midterms than presidential elections. 
Democrats currently have the enthusiasm edge. 
The NPR poll showed 61% of Democrats and those who voted for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris in 2024 are "very enthusiastic" to vote in these midterms. 
When it comes to Republicans, 53% described themselves as "very enthusiastic," and it was even lower  47%  with Trump voters specifically. 
Republicans have historically struggled to turn out Trump's base when he's not on the ballot. 
Among key voting groups, white voters with college degrees, who have trended in Democrats' direction in recent years, are among the most enthusiastic to vote, at 64%. 
The most enthusiastic pro-Trump group is white men without degrees, at 59%. 
White women without degrees have lower approval ratings of Trump and are less enthusiastic. 
Forty-five percent of them say they're "very enthusiastic" to vote. 
Parents who have children under 18 voted for Trump by 8 points in the 2024 election, but only 40% of them now say they're "very enthusiastic" about this November. 
Democrats face big challenges, too 
In most other years, these kinds of approval and enthusiasm numbers would point to a wave election. 
And, yes, overall Democrats appear to be in a good position to pick up the House. 
The national environment has even put the Senate in reach for them, even if it is still a reach. 
But there are some important factors that could lower their ceiling, namely depressed enthusiasm with some key groups, the fact that there are fewer competitive districts than ever before and the state of the redistricting battle. 
While young voters, as well as Black and Latino voters, all have very low approval ratings of Trump, they are among the least likely to be very enthusiastic about voting in November. 
Young voters in particular have a strong antipathy toward Trump, but they also have not had a very high opinion of Democratic Party leadership over the past year. 
That's led to lower favorability ratings overall for Democrats than Republicans in many polls. 
Perhaps the most important structural development is that Republicans got a few big wins on redistricting recently. 
The U.S. 
Supreme Court struck another blow to the Voting Rights Act, which could lead to a reduction of Black-majority, Democratic districts. 
Shortly after the court's decision, Louisiana suspended its primary elections to redraw its maps. 
Republicans could net two more seats out of that state, as a result. 
This week, Tennessee Republicans went ahead with a new map that seeks to eliminate the one Democratic-held seat in the state. 
And the Virginia state Supreme Court delivered a gut punch to Democrats on Friday, invalidating the results of a ballot initiative supporting redistricting that would have likely netted Democrats four seats. 
Florida Republicans, meanwhile, are pushing ahead with a map that could get Republicans more seats as well. 
There's no telling exactly how many seats Republicans could gain, but an estimate from the Cook Political Report shows, so far, the GOP stands to gain anywhere from five to 14 seats from redistricting. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.1%Domenico Montanaro: 3.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias2.1%This article: 6.6%Domenico Montanaro: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias6.6%This article: 8.9%Domenico Montanaro: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 8.0%Domenico Montanaro: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Domenico Montanaro: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 4.0%Domenico Montanaro: 12.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 3.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion3.0%This article: 1.7%Domenico Montanaro: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.5%Domenico Montanaro: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias10.5%This article: 3.9%Domenico Montanaro: 4.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias3.9%This article: 43.1%Domenico Montanaro: 14.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias43.1%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Domenico Montanaro: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Domenico Montanaro: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 31.3%Domenico Montanaro: 3.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias31.3%This article: 3.6%Domenico Montanaro: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.7%Domenico Montanaro: 3.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 0.8%Domenico Montanaro: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 3.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope3.0%This article: 1.2%Domenico Montanaro: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.2%This article: 20.3%Domenico Montanaro: 4.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization20.3%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Domenico Montanaro: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 3.7%Domenico Montanaro: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.7%This article: 0.7%Domenico Montanaro: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 29.5%Domenico Montanaro: 7.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)29.5%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.7%Domenico Montanaro: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division2.7%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 34.8%Domenico Montanaro: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)34.8%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Domenico Montanaro: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground1.6%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.2%Domenico Montanaro: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading1.2%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.0%Domenico Montanaro: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote13.0%This article: 1.7%Domenico Montanaro: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 35.5%Domenico Montanaro: 15.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice35.5%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 5.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Domenico Montanaro: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Domenico Montanaro: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.8%

1190 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.9%attributed speech1,156writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words100% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+58.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 58.8%58.8%Biased Writer Voice-36.6 ptsWriter: 36.6%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-13.4 ptsWriter: 13.4%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.