Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institutional Development results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (12,067 of 18,946 topics). This Institutional Development is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Institutional Development
Topic details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos