Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These District Attorney Decisions results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 18,957 topics). This District Attorney Decisions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
District Attorney Decisions
Topic details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos