Keyword summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos1,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zimbra results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,432 of 37,536 keywords). This Zimbra is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Zimbra
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Zimbra (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos