Keyword summary
28%1 analyzed article/video1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zenimax Online results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 3,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,335 of 37,536 keywords). This Zenimax Online is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Zenimax Online
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
22%Zenimax Online (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos