Keyword summary
47% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zambia results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,480 hits . Analysis detected 17,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,534 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,981 of 36,039 keywords). This Zambia is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Zambia
Keyword details
Total words: 25,534
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles25.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst