Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Peace & Justice Foundation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (3,405 of 37,536 keywords). This Youth Peace & Justice Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Youth Peace & Justice Foundation
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 40.4%40.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.7%14.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.1%23.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 40.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos