Keyword summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyoming Freedom Caucus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 2,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (43,034 of 55,191 keywords). This Wyoming Freedom Caucus is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Wyoming Freedom Caucus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠22%Wyoming Freedom Caucus (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos