Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Worst Record Covers In The World results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Worst Record Covers In The World is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Worst Record Covers In The World
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Worst Record Covers In The World (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos