Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World's #1 Wealth And Business results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 4,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,670 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,997 keywords). This World's #1 Wealth And Business is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
World's #1 Wealth And Business
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%World's #1 Wealth And Business (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,670
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos