Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Harassment results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 2,219 hits. Analysis detected 12,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,324 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,438 of 37,536 keywords). This Workplace Harassment is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Workplace Harassment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠65%Workplace Harassment (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,324
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate