Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Working Memory results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 802 hits . Analysis detected 6,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,797 of 37,536 keywords). This Working Memory is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Working Memory
Keyword details
Total words: 12,316
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst