Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Working Families results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 851 hits . Analysis detected 7,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Working Families is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Working Families
Keyword details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.8% 20.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst