Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker Power & Economic Security results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 938 hits. Analysis detected 8,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (25,509 of 35,229 keywords). This Worker Power & Economic Security is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Worker Power & Economic Security
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
28%Worker Power & Economic Security (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,808
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos