Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 6,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Woody Allen results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 897 hits . Analysis detected 9,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (34,738 of 34,858 keywords). This Woody Allen is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Woody Allen
Keyword details
Total words: 24,392
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst