Keyword summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 2,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women In Combat results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Unattributed Quote , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 517 hits . Analysis detected 6,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,332 of 37,536 keywords). This Women In Combat is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Women In Combat
Keyword details
Total words: 10,824
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst