Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,994 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wolverines results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 927 hits . Analysis detected 8,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,971 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Wolverines is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Wolverines
Keyword details
Total words: 5,971
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst