Keyword summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wolfgang Petersen results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hindsight Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 163 hits . Analysis detected 1,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (45,841 of 55,700 keywords). This Wolfgang Petersen is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Wolfgang Petersen
Keyword details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst