Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wokeism results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,077 of 37,536 keywords). This Wokeism is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Wokeism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Wokeism (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 27.6%27.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 23.9%23.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos