Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Election results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,593 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Wisconsin Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Election
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Wisconsin Election (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,593
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos