Keyword summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wiretap Act results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (23,365 of 37,536 keywords). This Wiretap Act is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Wiretap Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠38%Wiretap Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,037
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos