Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winter Warfare results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 570 hits . Analysis detected 4,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 39% (23,219 of 37,536 keywords). This Winter Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Winter Warfare
Keyword details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst