Keyword summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows Zero Day results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 289 hits . Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,918 of 37,536 keywords). This Windows Zero Day is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Windows Zero Day
Keyword details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst