Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wimberley results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Self-Serving Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 86 hits . Analysis detected 686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 36,197 keywords). This Wimberley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Wimberley
Keyword details
Total words: 2,190
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst