Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Yang results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (22,313 of 34,833 keywords). This William Yang is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
William Yang
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠36%William Yang (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos