Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Yang results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Status Quo Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 307 hits . Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 36% (22,313 of 34,833 keywords). This William Yang is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. William Yang
Keyword details
Total words: 2,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst