Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Ruto results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 283 hits . Analysis detected 2,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,514 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,423 of 37,536 keywords). This William Ruto is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. William Ruto
Keyword details
Total words: 2,514
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst