Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William J Nardini results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 232 hits . Analysis detected 1,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,465 of 37,536 keywords). This William J Nardini is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. William J Nardini
Keyword details
Total words: 1,784
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst