Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William B Ross results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 2,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,022 of 37,536 keywords). This William B Ross is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. William B Ross
Keyword details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst