Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 1,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Brownsberger results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 3,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,159 of 37,536 keywords). This Will Brownsberger is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Will Brownsberger
Keyword details
Total words: 4,347
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst